Candace Owens is facing renewed scrutiny after discussing a private meeting with Erika Kirk, the widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Initially intended as a constructive dialogue, the meeting sparked controversy, with critics alleging that Owens softened her position for financial motives. This backlash escalated on social media, driven by comments during livestreams and shared reactions.
Owens has rejected these claims, asserting that the online discourse reflects more about internet outrage culture rather than the meeting’s actual content. She emphasized the need for transparency and trust in politically charged media environments.
During a podcast and livestream, Owens addressed accusations that she had been “paid” to change her views post-meeting. She dismissed these claims as artificial outrage, indicating that many comments were generated by bots. Owens explained that the meeting wasn’t publicly conducted because an initial live discussion would not have been productive given the rising tensions.
She also acknowledged that a prior post urging donors to withdraw support from Turning Point USA was overly aggressive, saying, “I have to own that.” However, her skepticism about the official narrative regarding Charlie Kirk’s death remains, as she continues to question TPUSA’s position on the case. For Owens, the meeting represents a strategic shift in how she communicates certain claims rather than a withdrawal from her stance.
—
